Skip to main content
· 3/13/2007

Marilyn Gene Summers v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Warden Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Citations

  • 481 F.3d 710
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5751
  • 2007 WL 738447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Arizona’s Rule 32 of- 17 right proceeding is a form of “direct review” for pleading defendants
  • holding that an “‘of right proceeding,’ available under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 to criminal defendants who plead guilty, is a form of ‘direct review’ 25 within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1)(A).”
  • explaining that seeking reconsideration of criminal conviction from court that entered the judgment, while constituting a “review” of the conviction, is not an “appeal”
  • referring to “all forms of post-conviction review . . . other than direct appeal”
  • “Arizona courts have repeatedly characterized Rule 32 of-right proceedings as the functional equivalent of direct appeals . . . .”
  • an “of- 22 right” Rule 32 proceeding is form of “direct review” under § 2244(d)(1)(A) that delays 23 the start of the running of the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Rawlinson, Selna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.