Marietta v. Verhovec

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In order to receive a preliminary injunction, a party must demonstrate . . . .” (emphasis added)
• “‘A failure to consider relevant factors or to apply the proper legal standard constitutes such an abuse [of discretion]’” (citation omitted)
• “Once a registered trademark has been abandoned, any subsequent user of the mark must measure its rights from the time the subsequent use begins, and cannot rely upon any residual secondary meaning in the mark from the original period of use.”
• “An inherently distinctive trade dress is one that is ‘likely to serve primarily as a designator of origin of the product,’ taking into account ‘the nature of the designation and the context in which it is used.’” (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).