Marietta v. Professional Serv. Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1530
Syllabus
CIVIL-CONTRACTS-AGREEMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE-SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT-SUPERSEDING CONTRACT - Where conduct of Plaintiff/Appellant in attaching second written agreement as an exhibit to orifinal agreement, and subsequently attaching the original agreement to Plaintiff/Appellant's Complaint strongly suggested that Plaintiff/Appellant viewed both agreements as one fully integrated document, and where on motion practice, Plaintiff/Appellant further failed to introduce evidence that second agreement was intended to replace orifinal agreement, trial court did not err in finding that the second agreement was not a \standalone\ contract intended to replace original agreement, and that the contractual relationship between the parties was clear and unambiguous, and thus did not err in granting summary judgment to Defendants/Appellees as a matter of law.
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.