Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc.

• Article

• Talk

Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 596 U.S. 880 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Medicare Secondary Payer statute does not authorize disparate-impact liability , and the Marietta Plan's coverage terms for outpatient dialysis were lawful because those terms applied uniformly to all covered individuals.[1] [2]

References

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marietta_Memorial_Hospital_Employee_Health_Benefit_Plan_v._DaVita_Inc.&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: References")

1. ↑ Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
2. ↑ "Justices validate denial of insurance coverage for outpatient dialysis" . SCOTUSblog. June 21, 2022. Retrieved October 23, 2024.

External links

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marietta_Memorial_Hospital_Employee_Health_Benefit_Plan_v._DaVita_Inc.&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: External links")

• Text of Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court . As a work of the U.S. federal government , the text is in the **public domain **.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marietta_Memorial_Hospital_Employee_Health_Benefit_Plan_v._DaVita_Inc.&oldid=1342964830 "