Marietta Corp. v. Fairhurst
Citations
- 301 A.D.2d 734
- 754 N.Y.S.2d 62
- 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pricing data and market strategies do not constitute trade secrets
- stating that reliance on inevitable disclosure to imply a restrictive covenant against competition is “disfavored” absent an actual misappropriation, of trade secrets
- holding that pricing information does not generally constitute trade secrets
- setting out the fact finding a court must undertake to determine if information is a trade secret
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. CarmosinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-10-01· cited 22×
- Payment Alliance International, Inc. v. FerreiraS.D. New York· 2007-12-13· cited 16×
- Battenkill Veterinary Equine P.C. v. CangelosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-11-26· cited 16×
- Moser v. Devine Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-07-12· cited 12×
- U.S. Re Co. v. ScheererAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-06-07· cited 11×
- Sutherland Global Services, Inc. v. StueweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-05-07· cited 6×
- Eklund v. PinkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-07-13· cited 5×
- Widewaters Route 11 Potsdam Co. v. Town of PotsdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-05-22· cited 5×
- Colgate Inn, LLC v. Eberhardt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-06-09· cited 3×
- Marietta Corp. v. Pacific Direct, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-07-29· cited 2×
- RG & RH, INC. v. SCHMIDT'S AUTO BODY & GLASS, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-05-03
- Devos, Ltd. v. United Returns, Inc.New York Supreme Court· 2017-09-28
- Verizon New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-01-14
- Local Government Assistance Corp. v. Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp.New York Supreme Court· 2003-08-20
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-22· cited 338×
- Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-02-22· cited 249×
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-07-13· cited 248×
- Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals· 1963-12-30· cited 160×
- American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-04-02· cited 111×
- EarthWeb, Inc. v. SchlackS.D. New York· 1999-10-27· cited 33×
- Catalogue Service of Westchester, Inc. v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-01-28· cited 27×
- Peterson v. CorbinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-09-25· cited 22×
- Cool Insuring Agency, Inc. v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-12-04· cited 18×
- International Paper Co. v. SuwynS.D. New York· 1997-06-19· cited 16×
- Eastern Business Systems, Inc. v. Specialty Business Solutions, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-03-04· cited 12×
- H. Meer Dental Supply Co. v. CommissoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-03· cited 10×
- Arnold K. Davis & Co. v. LudemannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-04-26· cited 9×
- PSC, INC. v. ReissW.D. New York· 2000-08-23· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.