Skip to main content
· 12/9/2002

Marie O. Pedraza v. United Guaranty Corporation

Citations

  • 313 F.3d 1323
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 610
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24724
  • 2002 WL 31741475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “that the meaning of ‘costs,’ as used in Rule 7, should be derived from the definition of costs contained in the statutory fee shifting provision that attends the plaintiff’s underlying cause of action”
  • acknowledging “the general applicability of the American Rule regarding fee shifting, i.e., that each party bears its own attorneys' fees”
  • acknowledging “the general applicability of the American Rule regarding fee shifting, i.e., that each party bears its own attorneys' fees”
  • acknowledging the potential application of equitable tolling to RESPA actions
  • “costs on appeal” does not include attorney’s fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Marcus, Ungaro-Benages

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.