Marie Holdings, Inc. v. Biclyn Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the district court correctly concluded that the plaintiff’s actions were willful when he would not accept mail from the court, failed to respond to a motion to dismiss, and repeatedly missed deadlines
• “Under Rule 41(b), a district court has authority to dismiss an action sua sponte if a litigant fails to prosecute or to comply with a court order.” (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).