Marie Deonier & Associates v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying section 435 of the Restatement, the court held that an insurance company had a duty to inform its agent of a known risk of litigation arising from the policy she sold on behalf of the company
• applying section 435 of the Restatement, the court held that an insurance company had a duty to inform its agent of a known risk of litigation arising from the policy she sold on behalf of the company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).