Marie A. Kalwaytis Peggy Jackson Lydia T. Hreben Shirley Mustich v. Preferred Meal Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Giving a reasonably pragmatic interpretation of the two letters, we conclude that, read together, they do meet the statutory requirements of notice.”
• “Fairly read, the regulations require a practical and realistic appraisal of the information given to affected employees.”
• “Fairly read, the regulations require a practical and realistic appraisal of the information given to affected employees”
• subsequent clarification could be taken together with originally erroneous notice to constitute a single, and effective, WARN notice informing employees of a pending termination
• “Fairly read, the regulations require a practical and realistic appraisal of the information given to affected employees. We therefore examine the correspondence sent to the employees to determine if it provided adequate notification of the mass layoffs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).