Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District v. Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Ninth Circuit law to determine the pre-clusive effect of a ruling by its inferior court
• “The terms and conditions of the [CAP] subcontracts were to be subject to the Secretary’s approval . . . .”
• \Federal law determines the preclusive effect of a federal court judgment in state court.\
• “The party asserting the bar [of issue preclusion] must show that (1) the issue was litigated to a conclusion in a prior action, (2) the issue of fact or law was necessary to the prior judgment, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).