Maricopa County v. Biaett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in reliance on A.R.S. § 11-601(2), that attorney fees resulting from litigation concerning the scope of duties of the county recorder’s office were a county charge
• “[C]onclusions of ultimate facts and law do not satisfy the requirement that specific facts be set forth which show a genuine issue of material fact . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).