Mariano v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to prove defendant attempted to obtain possession of a controlled substance by uttering a forged prescription, state was required to establish specific intent to commit the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mercer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-12· cited 13×
• Cortez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-25

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Law
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
• McArthur v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-09-30· cited 185×
• Heiney v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-02-02· cited 147×
• Heiney v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1984-10-15· cited 124×
• Rose v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-09· cited 121×
• Mayo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-03-16· cited 113×
• Jaramillo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-08· cited 90×
• Gustine v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1923-06-13· cited 75×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-08-18· cited 56×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-05-01· cited 54×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-29· cited 46×
• Coester v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-16· cited 5×