Mariani v. Price Waterhouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that despite Bily’s use of the term “express” third party beneficiaries, “it does not appear Bily meant to create a new category of specifically designated beneficiaries, whether for tort or breach of contract purposes”
• noting that despite Bily’s use of the term “express” third party beneficiaries, “it does not appear Bily meant to create a new category of specif- ically designated beneficiaries, whether for tort or breach of contract purposes”
• “There was no allegation in the second amended (or any other) complaint that Mariani, as an individual or as general partner of one of the guarantor partnerships, engaged respondent’s services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).