Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff's allegation that she was a “resident” of Virginia was insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction over claims against Massachusetts corporation
• noting that “it is well-established that allegations of residency alone cannot establish citizenship” (citation omitted)
• finding that the complaint failed to comply with Rule 8(a)(1) where, inter alia, it merely alleged that defendant was a resident of Virginia
• ordering the parties “to submit additional affidavits regarding the plaintiff’s domicile and the defendant’s state of incorporation”
• ordering the parties after oral argument on appeal “to submit additional affidavits regarding the plaintiff's domicile and the defendant’s state of incorporation” to establish whether diversity jurisdiction existed
• ordering the parties after oral argument on appeal “to submit additional affidavits regarding the plaintiff's domicile and the defendant’s state of incorporation” to establish whether diversity jurisdiction existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).