Marian Mustata Lenuta Mustata v. U.S. Department of Justice Carol Jenifer, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a final deportation order places an alien constructively “in custody” because of “the specialized meaning those words have in the context of an immigration-related habeas petition.”
• discussing jurisdiction to review alien's due process claim based on ineffective assistance
• “We conclude that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) does not eliminate jurisdiction over the Mustatas’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition.”
• “We conclude that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) does not eliminate jurisdiction over [petitioners’] 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition.”
• “We conclude that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) does not eliminate jurisdiction over the Mustatas’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).