Maria Robinson and Winston Robinson v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court must focus on “those elements of the adjudged infringing products that the patentee previously contended, and proved, satisfy specific limitations of the asserted claims.”
• “Where one or more of those elements previously found to infringe has been modified, or removed, the court must make an inquiry into whether that modification is significant.”
• “[T]he party seeking to enforce the injunction must prove both that the newly accused product is hot more than colorably different from the product found to infringe and that the newly accused product actually infringes.”
• “Today, we reject that infringement-based understanding of the colorably different test.”
• “[W]here an injunction is written narrowly against 20 a particular infringing device, contempt may, nevertheless, be found on the basis of a 21 modified infringing device . . . . Again, the standard is whether the differences between 22 the two devices are merely colorable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).