Maria R. Rodriguez v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application of an amendment to 38 C.F.R. § 3.22 that barred hypothetical entitlement to 38 U.S.C. § 1318 claims, which was promulgated while the appellant’s dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC
• determining that the application of amended 38 C.F.R. § 3.22 would take a substantive right from the appellant
• discussing considerations relevant to determining which version of a statute or regulation should apply when there is a change during the pendency of a case
• discussing considerations relevant to determining which version of a statute or regulation should apply when there is a change during the pendency of a case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).