Maria Mendoza v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1983 claims based on detention without probable cause accrue when the detention ends
• holding that the favorable-termination requirement does not apply to a claim for unconstitutional pretrial detention
• concluding that claim of detention without probable cause is not analogous to tort of malicious prosecution and thus accrued when plaintiff was released from custody
• holding that there is no constitutional right not to be prosecuted without probable cause, but \there is a constitutional right not to be held in custody without probable cause\
• recognizing a longstanding constitutional right, under the Fourth Amendment, “not to be held in custody without probable cause”
• determining that the claim accrues when the “would-be plaintiff” is released from detention and “is entitled to sue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).