Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying the district court’s broad discretion under Rule 23(e) but also acknowledging that due process sets the ** The panel unanimously concludes that case number 16-17056 is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).