Skip to main content
· 11/10/1971

Maria Lapiczak v. Veronica Jean Glass Zaist

Citations

  • 451 F.2d 79
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 662
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the rules against enlargement of time frames are “mandatory and jurisdictional” and “cannot be circumvented regardless of excuse”
  • the rules against enlargement of time frames are \mandatory and jurisdictional\ and \cannot be circumvented regardless of excuse\
  • court’s order for a new trial on its own initiative untimely where not within the 10-day limit
  • improper to enlarge time period allowed by Rule 59(d)
  • improper to enlarge time period allowed by Rule 59(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Medina, Mansfield, Mulligan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.