Skip to main content
· 3/16/2006

Maria L. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Citations

  • 130 P.3d 657
  • 122 Nev. 305
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 27
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy when challenging an order concerning child custody in a juvenile proceeding
  • recognizing that a writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy when challenging an order concerning child custody in a juvenile proceeding
  • recognizing that a writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy when challenging an order arising in a juvenile proceeding
  • concluding that the district court’s analysis in the placement of a child should focus on whether the proposed plan will provide a stable, safe and healthy environment for the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Gibbons, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.