Maria Esparraguera v. Department of the Army

Oral argument

• Argued

  26 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[L]itigating positions [of federal agencies] are entitled to deference when they are not ‘post hoc rationalization[s]’ of previous agency actions.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (alteration in original)
• considering appeal from temporary reinstatement order without analyzing jurisdiction and noting that parties may seek judicial review of the Commission’s “final order” (citing 30 U.S.C. § 816(a))
• considering appeal from temporary reinstatement order without analyzing jurisdiction and noting that parties may seek judicial review of the Commission’s “final order” (citing 30 U.S.C. § 816(a))
• the fact that the phrase “pending final order on the complaint” of 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3
• the fact that the phrase “pending final order on the complaint” of 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).