Maria Corazon Senica Evangeline S. Senica Virgilio S. Senica Cherry S. Senica v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a parent’s knowledge or state of mind concerning a fraud- ulent application is imputed to the parent’s child with respect to grounds for inadmissibility
• holding that the BIA correctly imputed a parent’s knowledge that she and her children were not eligible for entry to the United States to her children
• imputing a parent’s knowl- edge of ineligibility for admission to that parent’s minor chil- dren to deny their application for discretionary admission under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(k)
• imputing a parent’s knowl- edge of ineligibility for admission to that parent’s minor chil- dren to deny their application for discretionary admission under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(k)
• “Therefore, the BIA reasoned, the children were not entitled to relief under [§ 1182(k)] because [their mother’s] knowledge was imputed to them”
• “A defendant who enters a guilty plea waives his right to a 17 trial by jury, and therefore also waives Alleyne and Apprendi’s protections of that right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).