Skip to main content
· 1/28/1985

Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. Upchurch

Citations

  • 696 P.2d 1195
  • 1985 Utah LEXIS 760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \representation of a limited partnership does not of itself require allegiance to the interests of the limited partners\
  • disqualifying law firm because representation would make it adverse to some of the limited partners of a company represented by the law firm in another action
  • mixed questions of fact and law do not require deference given findings of pure fact
  • “We recognize that disqualification motions based on very slight appearances of impropriety have been misused for tactical advantage in litigation.”
  • an attorney-client relationship was implied where the law firm had represented a limited partnership in which the would-be clients had invested
  • “We recognize that disqualifica- tion motions based on very slight appearances of impropriety have been misused for tactical advantage in litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.