· 1/28/1985
Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. Upchurch
Citations
- 696 P.2d 1195
- 1985 Utah LEXIS 760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \representation of a limited partnership does not of itself require allegiance to the interests of the limited partners\
- disqualifying law firm because representation would make it adverse to some of the limited partners of a company represented by the law firm in another action
- mixed questions of fact and law do not require deference given findings of pure fact
- “We recognize that disqualification motions based on very slight appearances of impropriety have been misused for tactical advantage in litigation.”
- an attorney-client relationship was implied where the law firm had represented a limited partnership in which the would-be clients had invested
- “We recognize that disqualifica- tion motions based on very slight appearances of impropriety have been misused for tactical advantage in litigation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.