Skip to main content
· 7/26/1994

Margrave v. Dermody Properties, Inc.

Citations

  • 878 P.2d 291
  • 110 Nev. 824
  • 1994 Nev. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law reviewed de novo
  • explaining that a “contract is ambiguous if it is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation”
  • \A contract is ambiguous if it is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.