Margolies v. Deason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the question of whether claims were time barred was “a question for the jury” because there were factual disputes regarding when the plaintiff knew or should have known about the wrongful act and resulting injury
• “whether the plaintiff ‘by exercise of reasonable diligence,’ should have learned of facts placing him on notice of his claim ... is commonly referred to as inquiry notice.”
• \The fact-intensive inquiry is typically appropriate for consideration by a jury.\
• limiting holding to expired claims without directly addressing viable claims
• “The fact-intensive inquiry is typically appropriate for consideration by a jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).