· 8/11/1972
Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.
Citations
- 200 N.W.2d 45
- 294 Minn. 274
- 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that those in privity may include those who control an action although not parties to it, those whose interests are represented by a party to the action, and successors in interest to those having derivative claims
- holding that “one who individually or in cooperation with others so controls an action in advancing his own interests has had his day in court and, in justice, should be bound by the adjudication”
- party in privity is one that, while not a party, controlled an action and whose legal interests were represented by a party to the action
- party in privity is one that, while not a party, controlled an action and whose legal interests were represented by a party to the action
- “Those in privity would include . . . successors in interest to those having derivative claims. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knutson, Rogosheske, Peterson, Nelson, Otis, MacLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.