Margiman v. Dowdell
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 377
Syllabus
Motion to vacate default judgment; rebuttable presumption; perfected service; Civ.R. 4.1(A)(1)(a); Civ.R. 4.6(D). The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant-appellant's motion to vacate default judgment. Appellant's unsigned affidavit had no evidentiary value; thus, appellant had no evidence to rebut the presumption that service had been perfected.
Judges: Calabrese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 420×
- Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 323×
- Sanford J. Berger v. City of Mayfield HeightsSixth Circuit· 2001-09-07· cited 112×
- State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Bloom-Carroll Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court· 2011-11-29· cited 68×
- Westmoreland v. Valley Homes Mutual Housing Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1975-05-14· cited 62×
- McWilliams v. SchumacherOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-10· cited 19×
- Midland Funding, L.L.C. v. CherrierOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-11· cited 15×
- Hathaway Brown School v. CummingsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.