Margenau v. Bowlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a mistrial may be warranted based on prejudice from improper testimony
• denying mistrial not abuse of discretion where reference was only to issuance of a traffic ticket, no mention of the citation was repeated, and reference was inadvertent
• finding C.R.C.P. 32 as another method for admitting deposition testimony in addition to former testimony 17 exception to the rule against hearsay
• “Ordinarily, curative instructions are sufficient to overcome evidentiary error, see People v. Gillispie , 767 P.2d 778 ([Colo. App.] 1988
• “It is for the jury to determine the weight of, and to resolve conflicts and inconsistencies in, the evidence.”
• “It is for the jury to determine the weight of, and to resolve conflicts and inconsistencies in, the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).