Skip to main content
· 12/28/1977

Margarite v. Ewald

Citations

  • 381 A.2d 480
  • 252 Pa. Super. 244
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • same, also noting that entireties presumption can only be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary
  • ”[W]hen property, real or personal, is placed in the names of husband and wife without more, a tenancy by entireties is presumed to have been created, and in order to rebut that presumption there must be clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.