Margaret Walker v. National Recovery, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that dismissal could be proper if plaintiffs do not intend to offer evidence beyond text of letters
• discussing confusion in the context of the FDCA, citing Lanham Act precedent and hold- ing that “[w]hether a given message is confus- ing is … a question of fact, not of law or logic.”
• discussing confusion in the context of the FDCA, citing Lanham Act precedent and hold- ing that “[w]hether a given message is confus- ing is … a question of fact, not of law or logic.”
• holding it is a question óf fact
• \How a particular notice affects its audience is a question . . . [that] may be explored by testimony and devices such as consumer surveys.\
• “How a particular notice affects its audience is a question ... [that] may be explored by testimony and devices such as consumer surveys.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).