Skip to main content
· 7/30/2002

Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. Bancorp

Citations

  • 297 F.3d 953
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6783
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8532
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2025
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15252
  • 2002 WL 1751037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the phrase “final judgment on the merits” is synonymous with “dismissal with prejudice”
  • noting that “a dismissal for failure to state a claim 25 under Rule 12(b)(6) is a ‘judgment on the merits’ to which res judicata applies”
  • noting that res judicata bars subsequent litigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in a prior action
  • reiterating that res judicata proscribes subsequent “lawsuits on ‘any claims that were raised or could have been raised’ in a prior action”
  • noting that “[t]he phrase ‘final 17 judgment on the merits’ is often used interchangeably with ‘dismissal with prejudice’” (cleaned up)
  • explaining that a dismissal for failure to state a claim constitutes a final judgment on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trott, Nelson, Rhoades

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.