Margaret S. Hall v. Marion School District Number 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the determination “whether [the employee] would have been fired ‘but for’ her protected speech . . . is a factual one, and therefore, is not to be reversed absent clear error” (internal citation omitted)
• holding that the determination 38 PARKER V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY “whether [the employee] would have been fired ‘but for’ her protected speech . . . is a factual one, and therefore, is not to be reversed absent clear error” (internal citation omitted)
• school district could face Monell liability for school board’s dismissal of teacher because board supported school superintendent’s efforts to retaliate against teacher after she wrote 11 letter that was critical of board’s handling of funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).