Skip to main content
· 4/19/1985

Margaret Lyles v. United States of America

Citations

  • 759 F.2d 941
  • 245 U.S. App. D.C. 215
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “an appellate court requires some reasonable measure of detail and exactness in the trial court’s findings as a predicate for intelligent review”
  • noting that “an appellate court requires some reasonable measure of detail and exactness in the trial court’s findings as a predicate for intelligent review”(internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “One of [Rule 52(a)’s] chief purposes is to aid the appellate court by affording it a clear understanding of the ground or basis of the decision of the trial court.” (internal quotation omitted)
  • “One of [Rule 52(a)’s] chief purposes is to aid the appellate court by affording it a clear understanding of the ground or basis of the decision of the trial court.” (internal quotation omitted)
  • “One of [Rule 52(a)’s] chief purposes is to aid the appellate court by affording it a clear understanding of the ground or basis of th e decision of the trial court.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • \One of [ Rule 52(a)'s] chief purposes is to aid the appellate court by affording it a clear understanding of the ground or basis of the decision of the trial court.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Edwards, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.