Margaret Katz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing opinions of doctor, psychiatrist, and social worker in determining whether claimant was currently engaged in SGA
• earnings 21 beyond a certain guideline create a rebuttable presumption of SGA
• parttime clerical duties were SGA where plaintiff failed to rebut earnings presumption, had worked for many years, and had proved satisfactory to her employer
• minor modifications made for an employee’s comfort could not 10 overcome the presumption that she had engaged in substantial gainful activity
• “Katz’s earnings, which were well above the statutory minimum, lead to a 20 presumption that she was engaged in SGA.”
• “[T]he fact that Katz worked only part-time is not alone enough to 3 || conclude that she was not engaged in [substantial gainful activity].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).