Margaret J. Schultz v. United States Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency’s requirement that resignation be submitted immediately was coercive
• noting that the Board has jurisdiction if agency lacks “reasonable grounds for threatening to take an adverse action”
• finding that a supervisor’s refusal to reconsider an absent without leave charge after receiving a medical certificate that fully supported the leave request was improper
• stating that the fact that an employee faces an unpleasant choice of either resigning or facing removal for cause does not render his decision involuntary
• stating that the fact that an employee faces an unpleasant choice of either resigning or facing removal for cause does not render his decision involuntary
• stating that an employee must “show that the [employer] knew that the reason for the threatened removal could not be substantiated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).