Maret v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party’s “repeated failure” 4 to appear at depositions “compounded by their continuing refusal to comply with 5 court-ordered production of documents constitutes an interference with the rightful 6 decision of the case”
• finding that a district court properly struck a defendant’s answer and 16 entered default as a sanction
• stating that prejudice occurs when a discovery violation “impair[s] the defendant’s ability to go to trial or threaten[s] to interfere with the rightful decision of the case”
• explaining that when a default judgment is entered as a Rule 37(b) sanction, “a party has no right to jury trial under either Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2
• declining to take judicial notice of a separate 16 lawsuit that “is not relevant to this case”
• declining to 21 take judicial notice of a separate action that was irrelevant to the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).