Marese v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to rule on a motion to modify sentence where the defendant showed he was not responsible for the fact that the hearing was set beyond the sixty-day limit
• holding that the trial court erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to rule on a motion to modify sentence where the defendant showed he was not responsible for the fact that the hearing was set beyond the sixty-day limit
• granting petition where petitioner showed that he was not responsible for setting of hearing beyond the sixty day limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).