Marella v. Terhune

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that administrative remedies may be effectively unavailable where the prisoner lacks the necessary forms or is reliably informed that he cannot file a grievance
• holding that 17 under this section and prison’s interpretation of it, “the prison’s regulations explicitly create an 18 exception to the timely filing requirement”
• holding that if Plaintiff was 4} unable to file grievance forms or if he was reliably informed that administrative remedies 5 | were not available, exhaustion is not required
• holding that if a plaintiff was unable to file grievance forms or if he 23 was reliably informed that administrative remedies were not available, exhaustion is not 24 required
• holding district 20 court erred in dismissing case for failure to exhaust where plaintiff was informed appeals process 21 was not available to him
• explaining that PLRA exhaustion requires a prisoner to “complete the administrative review process in accordance with the applicable procedural rules, including deadlines, as a precondition to bringing suit in federal court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).