Skip to main content
· 3/30/1993

Marek v. Stepkowski

Citations

  • 608 N.E.2d 285
  • 241 Ill. App. 3d 862
  • 181 Ill. Dec. 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendants’ argument that the jury’s verdict was unclear where the jury had found the two defendants liable as joint tortfeasors and then erroneously attempted to allocate damages equally between them
  • rejecting defendants’ argument that the jury’s verdict was unclear where the jury had found the two defendants liable as joint tortfeasors and then erroneously attempted to allocate damages equally between them
  • while assumption of risk may reduce recovery in a battery action, it does not bar it
  • because the “trial court may reject surplusage and mold a verdict into the proper form where the jury’s resolution of the issues it was to decide is clear,” the trial court properly ignored jury notations on verdict form

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCORMICK

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.