Marefield Meadows, Inc. v. Lorenz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] meeting of the minds is essential to the formation of a contract, but ‘the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts’ ”
• “This acceptance was unqualified and introduced no new terms. Thus, it meets the legal requirements for the creation of a contract through letters.”
• “A meeting of the minds is essen tial to the formation of a contract, but ‘the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts’ ”
• “A meeting of the minds is essential to the formation of a contract, but ‘the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts.’ ” (quoting Lucy v. Zehmer, 196 Va. 493, 503, 84 S.E.2d 516, 522 (1954))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).