Mardo v. Valley Smokeless Coal Co.
Citations
- 279 Pa. 209
- 123 A. 779
- 1924 Pa. LEXIS 704
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Fall of tree — Killing of boy — Evidence—Sufficiency of evidence for jury.</p> <p>1. It requires something more than the happening of an accident to fix liability on a defendant.</p> <p>2. Where a boy is-killed by the fall of a tree, it must be shown that the owner of the tree knew, or might by reasonable care have known, that it was in a dangerous condition.</p> <p>3. The fact that there were dead limbs at the top and dead roots at the bottom, while the rest of the tree appeared normal, does not establish negligence.</p> <p>4. Where the tree fell from no apparent cause, the court cannot charge that the weight of the tree caused its fall. There might have been other causes.</p>
Judges: Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Sadler, Schaffer, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.