Skip to main content
· 10/15/1840

Marden v. Babcock

Citations

  • 43 Mass. 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying three-part test in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 US 319, 96 S Ct 893, 47 L Ed 2d 18 (1976
  • applying Mathews v. Eldridge , 424 U.S. 319 , 335, 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1976
  • applying three-part test in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 US 319, 96 S Ct 893, 47 L Ed 2d 18 (1976); holding that preponderance of evidence standard for employment-related disciplinary proceedings based on allegations of fraud or misrepresentation comported with due process
  • con- cluding that a teacher’s “professional license and reputation as a teacher” were “significant interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.