· 10/27/1994
Marcus v. Township of Abington
Citations
- 38 F.3d 1367
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Stay orders normally are not appealable final orders because they merely delay proceedings in the suit.\
- \The 'mere prospect of delay' does not create appellate jurisdiction where it would not otherwise exist.\
- stay pending already have been lost. A victory at that completion of parallel state court criminal stage would be meaningless because the proceedings not appealable
- stay pending completion of parallel state court criminal proceedings not appealable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.