Skip to main content
· 3/23/1999

Marcus v. Kansas, Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 170 F.3d 1305
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2521
  • 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 281
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4852
  • 1999 WL 156036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fees, surcharges, and assessments that are assessed by the state for a particular purpose may be used on certain occasions for a different purpose without altering their status or converting them into taxes
  • holding that fees, surcharges, and assessments that are assessed by the state for a particular purpose may be used on certain occasions for a different purpose without altering their status or converting them into taxes
  • noting that where plaintiffs did not allege the absence of a plain, speedy, and efficient remedy in state courts, this exception to the TIA did not apply
  • stating that regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act have the force of law
  • stating that regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act have the force of law
  • conflating comity and Tax Injunction Act and distinguishing between fees and taxes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, McKay, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.