· 3/23/1999
Marcus v. Kansas, Department of Revenue
Citations
- 170 F.3d 1305
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2521
- 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 281
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4852
- 1999 WL 156036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that fees, surcharges, and assessments that are assessed by the state for a particular purpose may be used on certain occasions for a different purpose without altering their status or converting them into taxes
- holding that fees, surcharges, and assessments that are assessed by the state for a particular purpose may be used on certain occasions for a different purpose without altering their status or converting them into taxes
- noting that where plaintiffs did not allege the absence of a plain, speedy, and efficient remedy in state courts, this exception to the TIA did not apply
- stating that regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act have the force of law
- stating that regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act have the force of law
- conflating comity and Tax Injunction Act and distinguishing between fees and taxes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, McKay, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.