Marcus S. Robertson v. Virginia S. Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing injunction for protection against stalking because the actions of the respondent—visiting the petitioner's office once and calling the office twice to inquire about petitioner's whereabouts—would not cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress
• respondent’s conduct of looking inside petitioner’s house in the middle of the night with a flashlight, uninvited and without warning, for three consecutive nights was a course of conduct causing substantial emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).