Marcus Morgan v. SVT, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the original purpose of McDonnell Douglas ... was to outline a series of steps that, if satisfied, would support a plaintiffs right to reach a trier of fact”
• explaining that “the original purpose of McDonnell Douglas . . . was to outline a series of steps that, if satisfied, would support a plaintiff’s right to reach a trier of fact”
• affirming summary judgment on a race discrimination claim; plaintiff did not dispute the merits of disciplinary notices issued after he had reported misconduct by a supervisor
• affirming summary judgment where firing decisions were made “without input from Human Resources”
• “The central question at issue is whether the employer acted on account of the plaintiffs race (or sex, disability, age, etc.).”
• “The central question at issue is whether the employer acted on account of the plaintiff's race (or sex, disability, age, etc.)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).