Marcus Haliczer, D/B/A Noveltex Products Co. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acquiescence in the rejection and acceptance of a patent whose claims include the limitation added by the applicant to distinguish the claims from the prior art shows intentional withdrawal of subject matter
• “[D]eliberate withdrawal or amendment of claims ... to obtain a patent cannot be said to involve the inadvertence or mistake contemplated by 35 U.S.C. § 251, and is not an error of the kind which will justify the granting of a reissue patent which includes the matter withdrawn.”
• bars reissue claims of same scope

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).