Marco Thony Cadejuste v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners had adequate safeguards because it was required to comply with Tennessee Administrative Procedures Act and because its decisions were reviewable in court
• holding that Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners had adequate safeguards because it was required to comply with Tennessee Administrative Procedures Act and because its decisions were reviewable in court
• holding that members of the Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners were entitled to absolute immunity for actions taken during proceedings to suspend plaintiff's medical license because the suspension proceedings were adjudicative in nature and appropriate procedural safeguards were in place
• holding that members of the Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners were entitled to absolute immunity for actions taken during proceedings to suspend plaintiffs medical license because the suspension proceedings were adjudicative in nature and appropriate procedural safeguards were in place
• noting that the Tennessee medical board does not bring charges or conduct the investigation that led up to the issuance of the charges
• noting that the Tennessee medical board does not bring charges or conduct the investigation that led up to the issuance of the charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).