Marco Supply Company, Inc. A Virginia Corporation v. At & T Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that accidental or intentional misquotation of rate governed by filed tariff could not alter terms of parties' contract
• applying the doctrine to bar claims for willful misrepresentation where carrier quoted lower rate
• customer alleges willful misrepresentation of rates as to himself by AT & T and held not actionable
• \[A] regulated carrier must charge the tariff rate established with the appropriate reg- ulatory agency . . . . To do otherwise would be giving a preference to and discriminating in favor of the customer in question.\
• doctrine precludes claim of price misrepresentation
• doctrine precludes claim of price misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).